A Pilot Study of Whole-Brain Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Therapy for Early Stage of Alzheimer's Disease (LIPUS-AD): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

The prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been rapidly increasing worldwide. We have developed a novel angiogenic therapy with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS), which is effective and safe in animal models of AD and vascular dementia. We performed two trials of LIPUS therapy for AD (mild cognitive impairment due to AD and mild AD); a roll-in open trial for safety, and a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (RCT) trial for efficacy and safety. The LIPUS therapy was performed for whole brain through the bilateral temporal bones for one hour 3 times a week as one session under the special conditions (1.3 MPa, 32 cycles, 5% duty cycle) we identified. The LIPUS therapy was performed for one session in the roll-in trial, and 6 sessions in the RCT trial with 3-month intervals for 1.5 years. The primary endpoint was ADAS-J cog scores. The RCT trial was terminated prematurely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In the roll-in trial (N = 5), no adverse effects were noted. In the RCT trial (N = 22), the worsening of ADAS-J cog scores tended to be suppressed in the LIPUS group compared with the placebo group at week 72 (P = 0.257). When responders were defined as those with no worsening of ADAS-J cog scores at week 72, the prevalence was 50% (5/10) and 0% (0/5) in the LIPUS and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.053). No adverse effects were noted. These results suggest that the LIPUS therapy is safe and tends to suppress cognitive impairment although a next pivotal trial with a large number of subjects is warranted.

The influence of COVID-19 pandemic on management of acute myocardial infarction in Japan; Insight from the Miyagi AMI Registry Study.

Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the first state of emergency had been declared from April 7 to May 25, 2020, in Japan. This pandemic might affect the management for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Method and Results: To evaluate the critical care and outcomes of AMI patients during the COVID-19 outbreak, we examined the patients with AMI hospitalized in 2020 (n = 1186) and those in 2017-2019 (n = 4877) using a database of the Miyagi AMI Registry Study. The door-to-device time under the emergency declaration became longer as compared with that of the same period in 2017-2019 [83(65-111) vs 74(54-108) min, p = 0.04]. Importantly, the time delay was noted in only patients with Killip class I on arrival, but not in those with Killip class II-IV. Meanwhile, there were no significant changes in the duration from the symptom onset to hospital arrival, the use rate of ambulance and the performance rate of primary percutaneous coronary intervention before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. Eventually, in-hospital mortality had not deteriorated under the state of emergency (6.7 vs 7.8 %, P = 0.69). Conclusion: The emergence of the COVID-19 outbreak seemed to affect AMI management and highlight understanding the barriers to cardiovascular critical care.